a companion text to Rachel Ara’s American Beauty (a Trump L'oeil) by Laura Hudson
This text was written by Laura Hudson and commissioned by artist Rachel Ara to accompany her work at the Barbican, with the aim of bringing into public domain some of the discursive, free ranging conversations the artist was having with the people around her, specifically around the idea of sweet spots and their political parallels. 'Work is made through a series of conversations so I wanted to share some of the ideas discussed that opened up the work more for me'.
The sweet spot is a location or combination of characteristics that produces the best results. Knowing where the sweet spot is, is something of a connoisseurship, a kind a rigorous knowing acquired through practice. The batsman knows exactly where the bat should strike the ball for maximum impact, the opera singer knows exactly where to stand on any stage for her voice to be heard at its best, and the puppeteers know just where to throw their shadows to take our eyes off a scene change.
The sweet spot was once designed to provide the King and Queen, sitting side-by-side, with the best experience. However, travelling in wave form, both sound and light converge at a mysterious point just behind the pair, a hidden vantage point behind the throne*.
The Sweet Spot ?
Looking out through the window, a Trumpellian vestige rolls around a windy corridor - dystopian - humorous - iconic - ironic? A brutalist past with a futuristic beginning, brutal because it’s materials are what they say they are, fit for purpose and without pretence. Futuristic because the brutalists were designing for a Utopian future in which humanity could be accommodated and all traces of the past be erased. However, medieval palimpsests (wax writing tablets overwritten by future generations) show us what happens when we try to wipe the slate clean, traces of the past remain in the fabric of the thing, there is no such thing as forgetting, and “erasure, it turns out, is just a particularly profound form of preservation”.....
Today, for the most part, governing powers adhere to structures of high capitalism, orchestrated toward a single vantage point - the 1%. It is in their interests that policies are made, wars are waged and democracies are served. When the marginalised majority begin to show signs of unrest de facto figureheads are put forward to shift focus, frame the blame, and pretend to overturn establishments. On fighting terrorism D. Trump said "When you see the other side chopping off heads, waterboarding doesn't sound very severe." (Trump, D)
When the sweet spot is engineered toward the ‘power behind the throne’, we might point to what George W. Bush referred to as “the deciders” or Donald Trump calls the “deep state”. Closer to home our own brand of political sweet spot is perhaps best illustrated by the satirical TV programme Yes Minister. The organ grinders sit behind the puppets; Sir Humphrey Appleby to Bernard Woolly in Yes Minister: “Bernard, Ministers should never know more than they need to know. Then they can't tell anyone. Like secret agents, they could be captured and tortured”. Woolley: “You mean by terrorists? Appleby: By the BBC, Bernard”. As the figureheads are rolled out what they see is choreographed and what they smell is fresh paint. As if in a pantomime we want to shout ... its behind you! But there really isn’t any point. Mainstream media tell us that our politicians need to go on TV if they want to engage president Trump. It is a soap opera for an audience that isn’t really Trump, but rather the people he pretends to serve and the people to whom he is indebted. Truth has become a political strategy, cross-wired and engineered so that it is harder for us to tell which way is up.
Susan Sontag’s On Photography opens with:
“Humankind lingers unregenerately in Plato’s cave, still reveling, its age-old habit, in mere images of the truth…..Photographs furnish evidence. Something we hear about, but doubt, seems proven when we’re shown a photograph of it.” (Sontag,S. 1977).
It seems we must shape our tools and forever after be mesmerised by the tools that now shape us. Beyond the photograph that “passes for incontrovertible proof” the wire frame matrix is fleshed out, a hybrid fiction posing as the real thing, embedded into the fabric of the thing. No longer photographic, the pixel-generated scene takes on the form of its surroundings, chameleon-like it plays host to the reminder, the residue after an event, trapped behind a window, inside another dimension. On the sweet spot all is as it should be, no glitches, nothing visible from previous erasures, nothing to give the game away.
Sam Mendes’s Film American Beauty was written by Alan Ball, who recalls the moment of seeing a bag dancing in the wind as the original inspiration for his screenplay, which in turn became the inspiration for Ara’s American Beauty (a Trump L’oeil). Beyond the visual reference there is a also deeper resonance. In the film the protagonist is shot in the back of the head, precisely because he dares to walk out of the cave of projected shadows. To break with the social pact and pretence of what his life really is. He reaches out to open a window onto other worlds, after all, his world was only fronting ‘this entire life behind things’. Another filmic reference can be found in the Matrix, a black cat crosses a doorway, when it crosses again, it is the déjà vu that signals that the matrix has been altered by the machines.
In 1895 the experimental French poet, Stéphane Mallarmé, said that ‘everything in the world exists in order to end in a book’, in 1977 writer and political activist Susan Sontag challenged his assumption with her belief that ‘Today everything exists to end in a photograph’. 40 years on we could be tempted to challenge Sontag herself - with everything existing to end flicking on a screen; a sound bite, a disempowered glimpse that passes by. Unlike the printed page or the analogue photograph, without a physical presence, a meme; transient, mostly untraceable, viral yet temporary, is open to erasure and expiration, but capable of hitting multiple targets, unseen. This new cave of flickering shadows is hosted by giants - harvesting every trace of us and serving up what they want us to know, one by one.
The holographic principle tells us that everything exists as information and nothing is ever lost… we just need to know what we are looking for. The persona of Trump deflects from the very real and devastating changes to policy being irrevocably done. Sweeping deregulation means that measures put in place to protect people, resources, wildlife and their environments are now gone.
Laura Hudson is an artist and writer with a background in film and new media curation. A graduate of Glasgow School of Art’s Environmental Art department, Hudson went on to study artist moving image at Central St.Martins and is currently undertaking an MA in fine art at City & Guilds of London Art School. www.laurahudson.co.uk
Read Full text and information about the installation on the
Thanks to Mario Petrucci, writer in residence at CGLAS, for feedback on the working text.
Joe Robson *In reference to a conversation with Joe Robson from AVR London, whose work using CAD to map perspectival and anamorphic visualisations in the work of Holbein (The Ambassadors 1533) and the Theatre of Sebastiano Serlio, (1545), was published in Computers and the History of Art (CHArt) 1996. https://www.gim-international.com/content/article/how-historians-are-now-using-computer-technology
Dillon, Brian. (2006) The revelation of Erasure. Tate Etc. issue 8: Autumn 2006 Accessed March 29 2018 http://www.tate.org.uk/context-comment/articles/revelation-erasure
Trump, D. This Week with George Stephanopoulos, 2/8/16
Sontag, Susan. 1977, On Photography http://www.lab404.com/375/readings/sontag.pdf
Stéphane Mallarmé (1842-1898) A major French poet and critic whose experimental work inspired many of the revolutionary artistic schools of the early 20th century. Mallarmé changed the way poetry was viewed, writing the first poem mediated by cinema and anticipating concrete poetry in his obsession with layout.
American Beauty, 1999, [DVD]. Sam Mendes. Dir. USA: Dreamworks The title of the film refers to a breed of roses that while pretty and appealing in appearance, is often prone to rot underneath at the roots and branches of the plant. According to his Oscar speech, screenwriter Alan Ball was sitting at the World Trade Center plaza when he saw a paper bag floating in the wind and was inspired by it to write the film, which was originally conceived as a stage play. (IMDB)
The Matrix, 1999 [DVD] The Wachowskis Wr. Dir. USA
Yes Minister, 1980-1984, TV series, British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) UK. The political satire ran very close to the bone, but as the series progressed, perhaps due to its popularity, became more focused on the comedy - sometimes the only way to tell the truth is through humour.
Jean Baudrillard describes Simulacra, (simulations of the real) as "that which never hides the truth, but hides the fact that there is none"
The holographic principle as a theory was first proposed by physicist Leonard Susskind in the 1990s.
Sontag, Susan. 1964, Against Interpretation “The aim of all commentary on art now should be to make works of art - and, by analogy, our own experience - more, rather than less, real to us. The function of criticism should be to show how it is what it is, even that it is what it is, rather than to show what it means”
The original concept of a power behind the throne (a person or group who exercise the real power behind a high-ranking office) was a medieval figure of speech referring to the council or councilor, out of common sight, but whose influential whisperings had the ear of the monarch.
The term deep state was defined in 2014 by Mike Lofgren, a former Republican U.S. congressional aide, as "a hybrid association of elements of government and parts of top-level finance and industry that is effectively able to govern the United States without reference to the consent of the governed as expressed through the formal political process." wiki
American Beauty (a Trump L'oeil)
24 May—Jan 2019
An installation using film, poetry, humour and CGI to create an incongruous image that references film history, utopian architecture and contemporary politics. The iconic brutalist architecture of the Barbican becomes a glitch, a window through which we might catch a glimpse into our future. Visitors watch as an orange hairpiece dances in the wind in perpetuity around the Barbican Estate, echoing the iconic scene from Sam Mendes’ American Beauty. The title itself is a play on the phrase Trompe L’oeil (Deceives the Eye).
Rachel Ara is a conceptual artist whose cross-disciplinary practice is non-conformist with a socio-political edge, often incorporating humour and technology with feminist concerns. A 2016 Lumen Prize Finalist, this year Ara was recently selected for the London Open at the Whitechapel Gallery, and is currently artist-in-residence at the V&A.
Key contributions for this piece provided by the artist’s mother, Kay Le Seelleur Ara. CGI and animation by AVR London. Projections by Christie.